Object structure


click here to follow the link


Skutki prawne kontroli przedsiębiorcy prowadzonej z naruszeniem zasad kontroli

Alternative title:

Legal consequences of entrepreneur inspection conducted in violation of principles for inspection


Strzelbicki, Michał



Subject and Keywords:

entrepreneur inspection ; principles for entrepreneur’s business inspection ; liability of the state ; “fruit of the poisonous tree” principle ; limitations to use of illegally obtained evidence


Tyt. tomu: Praworządność, decentralizacja, przedsiębiorczość. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Leona Kieresa


With the enforcement of the Business Activities Freedom Act, the provisions of Chapter 5 entitled “Entrepreneur Inspection” have become to apply in the Polish Public Economic Law. The essence of the regulation lies in the principles for inspection, namely standards to be met by each and every entrepreneur’s business inspection performed by administrative bodies. Legal regulation of entrepreneur inspection, providing for legal framework of the procedure and setting limits to the actions of the inspection authority, was aimed by the legislator to limit the natural advantage of the authority over the entrepreneur during the inspection proceeding.The legislator was aware that the very introduction of principles for inspection would not be sufficient to effectively protect entrepreneurs’ interests. For this reason, the administrative authorities have been obliged to apply the principles for trader inspection through far-reaching negative legal consequences to the authority in the event of breach. The article analyses such legal solutions which provide entrepreneurs with the right to pursue compensation from the state, and permit demanding that the evidence gathered during the inspection could not be used against such trader by the administration authorities the “fruit of the poisonous tree” principle. The author presents the scope of application of both such instruments, and takes a stand as regards related detailed issues which have so far been the bone of contention both in the doctrine and in the judgements.

Place of publishing:



Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego


Kiczka, Karol. Red. ; Kocowski, Tadeusz. Red. ; Małecki, Witold. Red.

Date issued:



ISSN 0137-1134 ; ISSN 0239-6661




PAd P 101660 II


eng ; pol


Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, ISSN 0239-6661, No 3833. Przegląd Prawa i Administracji, ISSN 0137-1134, 2018, 114, s. 623-636

Is version of:

Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)

Rights holder:

© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o., Wrocław 2018


WR U/PAdjm