Object

Title: Criminalization conditioned by a social threat ; Społeczne niebezpieczeństwo czynu jako warunek kryminalizacji

PLMET:

click here to follow the link

Title:

Criminalization conditioned by a social threat  
Społeczne niebezpieczeństwo czynu jako warunek kryminalizacji

Creator:

Kulesza, Jan

ORCID:

0000-0002-0574-9120

Subject and Keywords:

social danger of an act   constitutional scope of criminalization   criminal liability   material element of an offense  
społeczne niebezpieczeństwo czynu   materialny element przestępstwa   odpowiedzialność karna   konstytucyjny zakres kryminalizacji

Description:

Tyt. tomu: Księga Jubileuszowa Profesora Tomasza Kaczmarka

Abstract:

A human action in order to be criminalized must be deemed socially harmful. In the social realm it is necessary to identify an action perceived as potentially harmful to legally protected values, that is one infringing upon them or threatening them to a degree exceeding socially accepted limits, one that is required or expected to be criminalized. The social threat as a particular characteristic of a human action serves as the broadest justification hence a verification and a rationalization of a criminal prohibition. The presumed abstract social harm a threat of an action which is to be criminalized serves as the lawmaker’s prerequisite for criminalization. Its constitutional foundations lie in the principles of a democratic state and the consecutive principle of proportionality is perceived broadly as a guarantee against the criminalization of actions that do not pose a social threat or ones that exercise individual rights and freedoms granted within the constitution. Penalizing actions that pose no social threat is a violation of the constitution. The notion of a social threat plays therefore a dual role. It obliges t he lawmaker to act in cases when the threat to individual rights and freedoms exceeds the socially acceptable level, including the obligation to introduce criminal measures against any particularly harmful infringement of those rights, but also the need to intervene in order to protect the values shared within a society. In the latter case the potential criminalization is originated within the principles and values expressed in Articles 2 and 5 of the Polish constitution. On the other hand, the potential social harm of an action serves as a safeguard against a too far reaching legal interference in individual rights and freedoms. This purpose is expressed in Article 31 para. 3 of the constitution. This limitative clause is to warrant the right balance between the protection of individual rights and freedoms or the protection of shared social values and state interference in those individual rights and freedoms necessary to ensure such protection.

Place of publishing:

Wrocław

Publisher:

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Contributor:

Giezek, Jacek. Red.   Gruszecka, Dagmara. Red.   Kalisz, Tomasz. Red.

Date issued:

2017

Date copyrighted:

2017

Detailed Type:

czasopisma (wydawnictwa ciągłe)   artykuł

Identifier:

oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:118401

DOI:

10.19195/2084-5065.43.18

Language:

pol   eng

Relation:

Nowa Kodyfikacja Prawa Karnego, ISSN 2084-5065, t. 43, 2017, s. 327-347

Is version of:

Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)

Rights holder:

Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o.

Autor opisu:

WR U/PAdbg

Object collections:

Last modified:

Apr 21, 2021

In our library since:

Nov 27, 2020

Number of object content hits:

1

Number of object content views in PDF format

1

All available object's versions:

https://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/publication/129027

Show description in RDF format:

RDF

Show description in OAI-PMH format:

OAI-PMH (DC)

OAI-PMH (METS)

Objects Similar

This page uses 'cookies'. More information