Repository of University of Wroclaw

Object structure

click here to follow the link

Dissenting opinions of judges from the perspective of epistemology of disagreement

jurisprudence metaphilosophy dissenting opinions of judges epistemology of disagreement

Tyt. tomu: Postanalityczna filozofia prawa

The concept of disagreement should be the key category for the jurisprudence, since law isconsidered to be a tool for dispute resolution. This concept has been examined so far mainly from the perspective of the features of the relation being the subject of disagreement questionis iuris, questionis facti. Theoretical implications or assumptions of agent-oriented approach have been neglected so far. This paper presents the key claims in the recently emerging field of metaphilosophy, i.e. epistemology of disagreement. One of the main problems being discussed is a question about a rational strategy in the case of epistemic peer disagreement: should a given belief be suspended skeptical strategy in such case or, rather, the fact of peer disagreement is not epistemically relevant.An effort is made, eventually, to look at the situation of dissenting opinions in court from the perspective of epistemology of disagreement.

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Jabłoński, Mariusz. Red. Paździora, Michał. Red.

PAd P 101660 II

Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, ISSN 0239-6661, No 3662. Przegląd Prawa i Administracji 2015, 102, s. 253-263

Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)

The use of this material is allowed only with accordance of applicable rules of fair use or other exceptions provided by law, and any broader use requires the permission of the authorized entity

Making materials available on the basis of the agreement with the owner of the property copyrights

Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o.