Object's details: O potrzebie utrzymania przepisu art. 256 § 3 k.k.

Description

• PLMET:
  
  http://confluence.man.poznan.pl/community/display/FBCMETGUIDE
• Title:
  
  
  O potrzebie utrzymania przepisu art. 256 § 3 k.k.
• Alternative title:
  
  
  On the need to maintain the provision of Article 256 § 3 of the Polish Penal Code
• Group publication title:
  
  
  Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem. 2023, 45, nr 4
• Creator:
  
  
  Lachowski, Jerzy
  
• Subject and Keywords:
  
  
  totalitarian regimes
   ;
  incitement to hatred
   ;
  ideology
   ;
  artistic activity
   ;
  scientific activity
   ;
  educational activity
   ;
  collecting activity
   ;
  exemption from criminal liability
   ;
  
  
  ustroje totalitarne
   ;
  nawoływanie do nienawiści
   ;
  ideologia
   ;
  działalność artystyczna
   ;
  działalność naukowa
   ;
  działalność edukacyjna
   ;
  działalność kolekcjonerska
   ;
  wyłączenie odpowiedzialności karnej
• Description:
  
  
  Is a continuation of: Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Studia nad Faszyzmem i Zbrodniami Hitlerowskimi ; 1 (1974) – 33 (2011) ; ISSN 0137-1126
   ;
  
  
  Stanowi kontynuację: Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Studia nad Faszyzmem i Zbrodniami Hitlerowskimi ; 1 (1974) – 33 (2011) ; ISSN 0137-1126
• Abstract:
  
  
  This study concerns the issue of exclusion of criminal responsibility for an offence under Article 256 § 2 of the Penal Code. The article analyses the prerequisites for the application of the justification normalized in Article 256 § 3 of the Penal Code. Critical assessments of this provision in the criminal law literature and calls for its repeal are also presented. The main reservation is related to the fact that it is not possible to commit an offence under Article 256 § 2 of the Penal Code within the framework of artistic, educational, collecting or scientific activities, because the perpetrator in such a case does not act with the aim of disseminating prohibited content, and above all does not propagate totalitarian systems. In this situation, the provision of Article 256 § 3 of the Penal Code appears to be unnecessary. However, the author of this study has attempted to demonstrate if an offence can be construed as a component of such types of activity, it falls under Article 256 § 2 of the Penal Code. This leads to the conclusion that the regulation contained in Article 256 § 3 of the Penal Code is needed in the Polish legal order.
• Place of publishing:
  
  
  Wrocław
• Publisher:
  
  
  Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
   ;
  Wydawnictwo „Szermierz” sp. z o.o.
• Contributor:
  
  
  Scheffler, Tomasz
  :
  Redaktor,
• Date issued:
  
  2023
• Resource Type:
  
  
  text
   ;
  
  
  tekst
• Detailed Type:
  
  
  article
   ;
  
  
  artykuł
• Identifier:
  
  oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:141741  ; https://doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.45.4.7  ;
  ISSN 0239-6661 (AUWr)
   ;
  ISSN 2300-7249 (SnAiT)
• Source:
  
  PAd P 101182 II
• Language:
  
  pol
• Abstract Language :
  
  eng
• Relation:
  
  
  Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, 0239-6661, No 4263
• Is version of:
  
  
  Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci
• Access rights:
  
  
  Attribution
   ;
  
  
  Uznanie autorstwa
• License:
  
  
  Creative Commons - Attribution (CC BY 4.0)
   ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en  ;
  
  
  Creative Commons - Uznanie autorstwa (CC BY 4.0)
   ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pl
• Rights holder:
  
  
  Copyright by Autorzy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego oraz Wydawnictwo „Szermierz” sp. z o.o., Wrocław 2023
• Autor opisu:
  
  WR U/PAdks

Object is located in the collections:

Additional information

• Creation date: 2025-02-14
• Last modification date: 2025-02-14
• Content object's number of views: 3
• You could also download the object's description in these formats:
  RDF
   ;
  OAI-PMH
• Download IIIF manifest:
  https://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/iiif-manifest/manifest/141741/PDF.json