Object's details: Kryteria sprawowanej przez sądy administracyjne kontroli decyzji uznaniowych

Description

• PLMET:
  
  http://confluence.man.poznan.pl/community/display/FBCMETGUIDE
• Title:
  
  
  Kryteria sprawowanej przez sądy administracyjne kontroli decyzji uznaniowych
• Alternative title:
  
  
  Criteria of review adopted by administrative courts to examine discretionary decisions
• Creator:
  
  
  Artymionek, Paweł
• Subject and Keywords:
  
  
  discretionary decision
   ;
  administrative decision
   ;
  administrative court review
   ;
  criteria of review adopted by administrative courts
   ;
  public authority supervision
   ;
  
  
  decyzja uznaniowa
   ;
  decyzja administracyjna
   ;
  kontrola sądu administracyjnego
   ;
  kryteria kontroli przyjęte przez sądy administracyjne
   ;
  nadzór władzy publicznej
• Abstract:
  
  
  The article concerns the criteria of review adopted by administrative courts to examine decisions issued by public authorities at their administrative discretion. The author presents views of legal commentators and judicial decisions with respect to administrative law and the case law of administrative courts, specifically investigating the current views. The author reflects on whether it is essentially admissible to review a discretionary decision. He also shows the differences and similarities between a mandatory decision and a discretionary decision and answers the following question: Is it admissible to review a discretionary decision by an administrative court on the basis of the criterion of expediency? Is the court only authorized to consider the criterion of legality?According to the main conclusions of the article, there are no differences between a mandatory decision and a discretionary decision as far as the review by the administrative courts is concerned; the criterion of expediency is permitted if such a criterion emanates from the regulations empowering the authority to make discretionary decisions; it has also been observed that administrative courts increasingly expand the review capacity to ensure compliance with the law, so that any such review could also be used to verify the correctness of the discretionary decision which has been issued.
• Place of publishing:
  
  Wrocław
• Publisher:
  
  Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
• Contributor:
  
  
  Klat-Wertelecka, Lidia
  :
  Redaktor,
• Institution:
  
  
  Uniwersytet Wrocławski
• Date issued:
  
  2013
• Date copyrighted:
  
  2013
• Resource Type:
  
  
  tekst
• Detailed Type:
  
  
  czasopisma (wydawnictwa ciągłe)
   ;
  artykuł
• Identifier:
  
  oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:119428  ;
  ISSN 0524-4544
   ;
  ISSN 0239-6661
• Source:
  
  PAd P 101182 II
• Language:
  
  pol
• Abstract Language :
  
  eng
• Relation:
  
  Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, ISSN 0239-6661, No 3508. Prawo, ISSN 0524-4544, 2013, 315, nr 1, s. 7-16
• WUL Catalog:
  
  
  https://katalog.bu.uni.wroc.pl/lib/item?id=chamo:109940
• Is version of:
  
  Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)
• Access rights:
  
  
  Korzystanie z tego materiału jest możliwe zgodnie z właściwymi przepisami o dozwolonym użytku lub innych wyjątkach przewidzianych w przepisach prawa, a korzystanie w szerszym zakresie wymaga uzyskania zgody uprawnionego
• License:
  
  
  Udostępnianie na podstawie umowy z właścicielem majątkowych praw autorskich
• Rights holder:
  
  Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o.
• Location of original object:
  
  
  Biblioteka Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii
• Autor opisu:
  
  WR U/PAdbg

Object is located in the collections:

Additional information

• Creation date: 2021-01-14
• Last modification date: 2024-04-25
• Content object's number of views: 238
• You could also download the object's description in these formats:
  RDF
   ;
  OAI-PMH
• Download IIIF manifest:
  https://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/iiif-manifest/manifest/119428/PDF.json