Considering the main subject of XXII Congress of the Chairs of Theory and Philosophy of Law the author tries to answer the following question: “Jurisprudence — the political of science or science of the political?”. His answer is clear — we need the latter and not the former. In the article the concepts of „politics”, „political” and „politization” are treated synonymously. The problem is presented on the background of Carl Schmitt’s political philosophy. In the author’s opinion after 1933 Schmitt has balanced between these two attitudes (the political of science or science of the political) because of his methodology (political theology) on the one hand, and of his personal choice (support for Nazi regime) on the other. In the last part of the article are formulated some conclusions — learned from Schmitt’s lesson and concerning the constitutional crisis in Poland
Jun 24, 2020
Jun 23, 2020
|Prawoznawstwo — polityczność nauki czy nauka polityczności?||Jun 24, 2020|
Zirk-Sadowski, Marek (1952- ) Bator, Andrzej Red. Kaczmarek, Przemysław. Red.
Bator, Andrzej Kaczmarek, Przemysław Bator, Andrzej Red. Kaczmarek, Przemysław. Red.
Raszewska-Skałecka, Renata Babińska-Górecka, Renata. Red. Jabłoński, Mariusz. Red.
Wronkowska, Sławomira (1943- ). Bator, Andrzej Red. Kaczmarek, Przemysław. Red.
Łakomy, Jakub Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Katedra Doktryn Politycznych i Prawnych Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Koło Doktryn Politycznych i Prawnych
Wiązek, Paweł Jabłoński, Mariusz. Red. Jarosz-Żukowska, Sylwia. Red.
Bernaczyk, Michał Jabłoński, Mariusz. Red. Bisztyga, Andrzej. Rec.