Title: Commentary to the Supreme Court’s judgment of January 25 2018, I KZP 12/17


click here to follow the link


In the commented judgment the Supreme Court took the view that the interlocutory appeal against the appellate court’s refusal to accept the party’s motion for the statement of reason of a judgment is inadmissible in proceedings concerning misdemeanours. According to the Supreme Court, such conclusion may be derived from the principle of non-appeal from the decisions of appellate courts. It is also supported by the fact that the judgment of the appellate court in such proceedings is not subject to cassation, so the written statement of reason is only for information purposes. The author of this commentary disagrees with the thesis and its justification. In the paper, the views of doctrine and judicature are analysed, viewing statement of reasons as part of the fair trial and procedural fairness standard, which should be guaranteed regardless of whether the judgment is still subject to appeal or cassation. The statement of reason is of such importance to the parties and society that there is no basis for differentiating the standard in criminal proceedings and in proceedings concerning misdemeanors in this respect.

Date issued:


Resource Type:



ISSN 2450-3932 ; DOI: 10.23734/FIUW.2018.1.271.282


pol ; eng

WUL Catalog:

click here to follow the link

Is part of:

click here to follow the link

Is referenced by:



Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis


Rules of usage of Digital Library of Wroclaw University

Licence text:

click here to follow the link

Rights holder:

© Copyright by Dorota Czerwińska

Location of original object:

Library of the Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics

Autor opisu:

TK ; WR U/PAdjm

Object collections:

Last modified:

Jun 7, 2019

In our library since:

Nov 7, 2018

Number of object content hits:


All available object's versions:


Show description in RDF format:


Show description in OAI-PMH format:


This page uses 'cookies'. More information