PLMET:

click here to follow the link

Creator:

Czerwińska, Dorota

Abstract:

In the commented decision the Supreme Court presented the view that absence of any of the members of the court panel during the whole trial constitutes absolute grounds for reversing the judgment only if he or she was absent during evidentiary proceedings. The author agrees with this thesis. However, she points out that the Supreme Court took into account – while establishing that absolute grounds for reversal existed – whether the particular procedures conducted during the absence infringed the rights of the accused. The author does not approve of such an approach as leading to unnecessary relativity of absolute grounds for reversing the judgment.

Place of publishing:

Wrocław

Publisher:

E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Contributor:

Górnicki, Leonard. Red.

Date issued:

2017

Resource Type:

journal

Format:

application/pdf

Identifier:

oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:79811 ; ISSN 2450-3932

Language:

pol ; eng

WUL Catalog:

click here to follow the link

Is referenced by:

www.fiw.prawo.uni.wroc.pl

Replaces:

Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis

Access rights:

Rules of usage of Digital Library of Wroclaw University

License:

click here to follow the link

Rights holder:

© Copyright by Dorota Czerwińska

Location of original object:

Library of the Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics