PLMET:

click here to follow the link

Creator:

Czerwińska, Dorota

Abstract:

In the commented decision the Supreme Court presented the view that recent amendments of legal provisions concerning presence of the accused during the main trial mean that infringements committed before July 1st 2015 lost the quality of absolute grounds for reversing the judgment. The author disagrees with this thesis. The commentary analyses the views on the possibility of validating deficient trial procedures (including the deficient main trial and the infringements listed as absolute grounds for reversing the judgment) expressed in earlier legal literature and jurisprudence. The author comes to the conclusion that validating highly defective trial procedures is possible before issuing the original judgments, impossible – after the judgment becomes final and doubtful – during appellate proceedings. In the concluding remarks the author points out that the Supreme Court in one of its recent judgments has already adopted a different stance than in the commented decision – and that the latter deserves merit.

Place of publishing:

Wrocław

Publisher:

E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Contributor:

Górnicki, Leonard. Red.

Date issued:

2015

Resource Type:

journal

Format:

application/pdf

Identifier:

oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:79291 ; ISSN 2450-3932

Language:

pol ; eng

WUL Catalog:

click here to follow the link

Is referenced by:

www.fiw.prawo.uni.wroc.pl

Replaces:

Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis

Access rights:

Rules of usage of Digital Library of Wroclaw University

License:

click here to follow the link

Rights holder:

© Copyright by Dorota Czerwińska

Location of original object:

Library of the Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics