Object

Title: Criteria of review adoptedby administrative courtsto examine discretionary decisions ; Kryteria sprawowanej przez sądy administracyjne kontroli decyzji uznaniowych

PLMET:

click here to follow the link

Title:

Criteria of review adoptedby administrative courtsto examine discretionary decisions  
Kryteria sprawowanej przez sądy administracyjne kontroli decyzji uznaniowych

Creator:

Artymionek, Paweł

Subject and Keywords:

discretionary decision   administrative decision   administrative court review   criteria of review adopted by administrative courts   public authority supervision  
decyzja uznaniowa   decyzja administracyjna   kontrola sądu administracyjnego   kryteria kontroli przyjęte przez sądy administracyjne   nadzór władzy publicznej

Abstract:

The article concerns the criteria of review adopted by administrative courts to examine decisions issued by public authorities at their administrative discretion. The author presents views of legal commentators and judicial decisions with respect to administrative law and the case law of administrative courts, specifically investigating the current views. The author reflects on whether it is essentially admissible to review a discretionary decision. He also shows the differences and similarities between a mandatory decision and a discretionary decision and answers the following question: Is it admissible to review a discretionary decision by an administrative court on the basis of the criterion of expediency? Is the court only authorized to consider the criterion of legality?According to the main conclusions of the article, there are no differences between a mandatory decision and a discretionary decision as far as the review by the administrative courts is concerned; the criterion of expediency is permitted if such a criterion emanates from the regulations empowering the authority to make discretionary decisions; it has also been observed that administrative courts increasingly expand the review capacity to ensure compliance with the law, so that any such review could also be used to verify the correctness of the discretionary decision which has been issued.

Place of publishing:

Wrocław

Publisher:

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Contributor:

Klat-Wertelecka, Lidia (1967-2017). Red.

Date issued:

2013

Date copyrighted:

2013

Detailed Type:

czasopisma (wydawnictwa ciągłe)   artykuł

Identifier:

oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:119428

Source:

PAd P 101182 II

Language:

pol   eng

Relation:

Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, ISSN 0239-6661, No 3508. Prawo, ISSN 0524-4544, 2013, 315, nr 1, s. 7-16

WUL Catalog:

click here to follow the link

Is version of:

Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)

Rights holder:

Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o.

Location of original object:

Biblioteka Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii

Autor opisu:

WR U/PAdbg

Object collections:

Last modified:

Apr 14, 2021

In our library since:

Jan 14, 2021

Number of object content hits:

45

Number of object content views in PDF format

45

All available object's versions:

https://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/publication/129913

Show description in RDF format:

RDF

Show description in OAI-PMH format:

OAI-PMH (DC)

OAI-PMH (METS)

This page uses 'cookies'. More information