Object

PLMET:

click here to follow the link

Title:

Handwriting validation: results and validity of comparison materials. Case discussion

Creator:

Alamoreanu, Sorin   Florescu, Bogdan

Subject and Keywords:

handwriting examination   comparison materials   expert opinion   validity of comparison materials  
badanie pisma ręcznego   materiały porównawcze   ekspertyzy   ważność materiałów porównawczych

Abstract:

In most cases “handwriting validation” is synonymous to “establishing the graphical structure’s author”. If this is absolutely true for the cases when handwriting samples have been created for the comparison purposes in the presence of the judicial organ, certain cases could come to the point where the presumed authors are deceased or missing, or the materi­als offered for judgment have been written on previous occasions also known as “free comparison samples”. Still, practice has proven the contrary to the perfect overlapping of the two expressions. In certain debates, the contradictorily phases of evidence admission comparison samples offered by one of the litigating parties are supposed to the accept accept­ance or rejection of the other part. Notary procedures though usually have no debate over the source of the comparison materials, as they generally are presented by the inheritors. Therefore, there will be no contradictorily debate upon. Romanian handwriting examina­tion practice has met certain situations when based on the uncontested initial origin of the comparison writing, experts have validated certain writing on documents in full honesty. After a certain time legal heirs have challenged in court those documents and the identi­fication reports based upon them, offering a wider and more trusted range of writing and signatures from the supposed author. One can assume that in such cases even though the validation was formally correct, the true author of the handwriting has not been identified and the wrong premise of handwriting paternity has led to a an erred legal appearance, being generated as such through mistaken comparison samples.

Place of publishing:

Wrocław

Publisher:

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Contributor:

Kalisz, Tomasz. Red.   Cieśla, Rafał. Red.

Date issued:

2017

Date copyrighted:

2017

Detailed Type:

czasopisma (wydawnictwa ciągłe)   artykuł

Identifier:

oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:118436   ISSN 2084-5065   ISSN 0239-6661

DOI:

10.19195/2084-5065.45.8

Language:

eng

Relation:

Nowa Kodyfikacja Prawa Karnego, ISSN 2084-5065, t. 45, 2017, s. 91-99

WUL Catalog:

click here to follow the link

Is version of:

Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)

Rights holder:

Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o.

Autor opisu:

WR U/PAdbg