A Commentary to the Supreme Court’s Resolution of 11 December 2018, IIII CZP 31/18 a Copy of the pleading containing the extensions is not subject to the notification based on article 132 § 1 of Code of Civil Procedure
The subject of the commentary is the resolution of the Supreme Court of 11 December 2018, III CZP 31/18 which states that in a situation where both parties are represented by professional representatives a copy of the letter containing the extension of the claim should be delivered to the defendant by the court. This issue has caused discrepancies in the case law of common courts and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the study analyzes the arguments presented by the Supreme Court in the justification of the said decision; additional circumstances are also cited, which, according to the author of the commentary, prove the legitimacy of the official notification extending the claim which will ensure the efficiency of the proceedings and will counteract legal uncertainty.
Jun 24, 2020
Jun 15, 2020
Soroka, Piotr Korkuś-Soroka, Magdalena Jakubowski, Sebastian. Red. Kostecka-Jurczyk, Daria. Red.
Goździaszek, Łukasz Jabłoński, Mariusz. Red. Jarosz-Żukowska, Sylwia. Red.
Plewka, Joanna Marszałkowska-Krześ, Elwira Red. Głodowski, Włodzimierz. Rec. Błaszczak, Łukasz. Rec.
Pałęga, Dominika Marszałkowska-Krześ, Elwira Red. Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Kinga. Rec. Głodowski, Włodzimierz. Rec.
Gościniak, Michał Marszałkowska-Krześ, Elwira Red. Głodowski, Włodzimierz. Rec. Błaszczak, Łukasz. Rec.
Skawińska, Julia Marszałkowska-Krześ, Elwira Red. Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Kinga. Rec. Głodowski, Włodzimierz. Rec.
Biłostockyj, Stepan Górnicki, Leonard. Red.
Korczak, Jerzy Red. Szreniawski, Jan Rec.