- ris
- BibTeX

Resolution of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber of 17 March 2017, III CZP 110/16 – Commentary

Tułak, Norbert

Object structure

click here to follow the link

Resolution of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber of 17 March 2017, III CZP 110/16 – Commentary

Tułak, Norbert

0000-0001-9213-4505

inheritance law ; waiver of succession ; waiver of legitime ; legitime ; inheritance contracts

The Supreme Court in the resolution of 17.3.2017 ruled that it is permissible to conclude an agreement on a waiver of legitime, indicating as the basis of Article 1048 of the Civil Code. The position of the Supreme Court presented in the ruling should be considered incorrect. This is justified by the significant doubts appearing, especially in the context of the regulation contained in Article 1047 Civil Code. The reference to the inferential directive and the maiori ad minus should be regarded as unfounded, as is the application of the rule that is unknown to the law, in the case of which 'what is not expressly prohibited is allowed'. The view that the exclusion of the admissibility of concluding renegotiation agreements restricts the principle of freedom of testing is irrelevant. Finally, the issue of legal consequences caused by the conclusion of the agreement on waiving the right to a reserved portion of a third party, which the Supreme Court omits in its ruling, raises doubts.

E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Górnicki, Leonard. Red.

10.34616/fiuw.2019.2.219.228

click here to follow the link

Folia Iuridica Universitatis Wratislaviensis. 2019, vol. 8, no 2

www.fiw.prawo.uni.wroc.pl

Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis

© Copyright by Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Library of the Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics

WR U/PAdjm ; TK