Szczegóły obiektu: Totalna negacja inteligencji. Idee Jana Wacława Machajskiego i Michała Bakunina

Opis

• PLMET:
  
  http://confluence.man.poznan.pl/community/display/FBCMETGUIDE
• Tytuł:
  
  
  Totalna negacja inteligencji. Idee Jana Wacława Machajskiego i Michała Bakunina
• Tytuł odmienny:
  
  
  Total Negation of the Intelligentsia. Ideas by Jan Wacław Machajski and Michał Bakunin
• Twórca:
  
  
  Dubel, Lech
  
• Temat i słowa kluczowe:
  
  
  revolutionary intelligentsia
   ;
  intellectual worker
   ;
  education as property
   ;
  critic of socialist programmes
   ;
  exploitation of uneducated proletarians by socialist
   ;
  Bakunin, Mihail Aleksandrovič (1814-1876)
   ;
  Machajski, Jan Wacaw
   ;
  
  
  rewolucyjna inteligencja
   ;
  Bakunin, Mihail Aleksandrovič (1814-1876)
   ;
  Machajski, Jan Wacław
   ;
  edukacja jako własność
   ;
  krytyka programów socjalistycznych
   ;
  wykorzystywanie niewykształconych proletariuszy przez socjalistów
• Opis:
  
  Artykuły dedykowane Profesor Marii Zmierczak z okazji jubileuszu 70. urodzin
• Abstrakt:
  
  
  The article begins with a discussion on the main views expressed in the literature concerning the origins, the essence of the intelligentsia and its features. Against that background, it reconstructs a critical understanding of the intelligentsia as a social stratum as expressed by Bakunin and Jan Wacław Machajski. Both were the representatives of the radical, leftist thought of the 19th and the turn of the 19th and 20th century. It is indicated that neither of them defines the intelligentsia in their writings. They commonly use the term intellectual worker, which is quite accurately described.The issue of the intellectual worker and, more broadly, the intelligentsia, is clearly part of the doctrine of Bakunin. It is also important in the thought of Jan Wacław Machajski. They were both representatives of the intelligentsia in the sense of their social status. Both supported the instrumen­tal perception of the intelligentsia as a specific social group. The path of intellectual development and political activity of both writers and political activists, which led them to extreme revolutionary radicalism, was evolutionary. It led through a fascination with different, often conflicting, ideologies at various stages in life, eventually aiming at that radical revolutionary attitude. The political tho­ught in both cases was dynamic and subject to evolution. Both lived in literary and political circles. They considered their intellectual and political activity as a kind of liberation mission aimed at the enslaved society. They expressed similar views concerning the function of the intelligentsia both in terms of its social and political role in exploited and enslaved societies and, above all, its ambiguous place in the future revolution. Bakunin formulated anti-intellectual and anti-intelligentsia proposals, whereas Machajski — mainly anti-intelligentsia ones. The possible thesis about the identity of the anti-intellectualism and anti-intelligentsia seems to be at least questionable. Insofar as Machajski’s concept of the intelligentsia only has a political aspect based on the Marxist phraseology, Bakunin’s previous ideas and his anti-intellectualism have a mainly philosophical, and only then political, dimension. However, ultimately, they both represent the attitude of political nihilism. For both of them the critical characteristics of the intelligentsia generally applies to the revolutionary intelli­gentsia which claims the right to care of the proletarians, yet most often it does so in their own in­terest. Against this background, a conclusion is made that education is a kind of property and hence a source of exploitation, class exploitation, in fact. However, the arguments of both political writers concerning this issue are different, and so are the derived conclusions.
• Miejsce wydania:
  
  Wrocław
• Wydawca:
  
  Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
• Współtwórca:
  
  
  Maciejewski, Marek
  :
  Redaktor,
   ;
  Scheffler, Tomasz
  :
  Redaktor,
• Data wydania:
  
  2016
• Data zastrzeżenia praw autorskich:
  
  2016
• Typ zasobu:
  
  
  tekst
• Szczegółowy typ zasobu:
  
  
  czasopisma (wydawnictwa ciągłe)
   ;
  artykuł
• Identyfikator:
  
  oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:107782  ; https://doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.38.4.6  ;
  ISSN 0239-6661
   ;
  ISSN 2300-7249
• Źródło:
  
  PAd P 101182 II
• Język:
  
  pol
• Powiązanie:
  
  Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, ISSN 0239-6661, No 3778, Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem. 2016, 38, nr 4, s. 69-95
• Jest wersją:
  
  Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)
• Prawa dostępu:
  
  
  The use of this material is allowed only with accordance of applicable rules of fair use or other exceptions provided by law, and any broader use requires the permission of the authorized entity
   ;
  
  
  Korzystanie z tego materiału jest możliwe zgodnie z właściwymi przepisami o dozwolonym użytku lub innych wyjątkach przewidzianych w przepisach prawa, a korzystanie w szerszym zakresie wymaga uzyskania zgody uprawnionego
• Licencja:
  
  
  Making materials available on the basis of the agreement with the owner of the property copyrights
   ;
  
  
  Udostępnianie na podstawie umowy z właścicielem majątkowych praw autorskich
• Właściciel praw:
  
  Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o.
• Autor opisu:
  
  WR U/PAdbg

Obiekt znajduje się w kolekcjach:

Informacje dodatkowe

• Data utworzenia: 2020-04-02
• Data ostatniej modyfikacji: 2024-08-26
• Liczba wyświetleń treści obiektu: 102
• Możesz również pobrać opis tego obiektu w formatach:
  RDF
   ;
  OAI-PMH
• Pobierz manifest IIIF:
  https://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/iiif-manifest/manifest/107782/PDF.json