The author of the study tries to answer the question about the theory of the nature of possession in Scottish jurisprudence on the basis of the existing model of possessory protection. To this end he analyses spuilzie — a Scottish remedy to seek restitution, popular especially in the 17th and 18th centuries.He presents the views of the most important Scottish jurists, regarded as institutional writers of the day: James Dalrymple, Viscount of Stair; Andrew MacDougall, Lord Bankton; and John Erskine of Carnock. In addition, he presents the case law of Scotland’s Supreme Court (Court of Session) concerning the subject matter in question.The problems analysed by the author are as follows: the origins and ways of defining the legal basis of the remedy, its legal nature, capacity to sue, separate procedures and forms of defence employed by the sued party in spuilzie cases.
Apr 14, 2021
Nov 25, 2019
|„Spoliatus ante omnia restituendus est. Spuilzie” jako szkocka metoda restytucji utraconego posiadania||Apr 14, 2021|
Szymura, Mateusz Przygodzki, Jacek. Red. Jurek, Piotr. Rec.
Szymura, Mateusz Ptak, Marian J. (1950-). Red.
Szymura, Mateusz Koredczuk, Józef. Red. Wiązek, Paweł. Red.
Szymura, Mateusz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-8477 0000-0001-7146-8477 Jabłoński, Mariusz. Red. Jarosz-Żukowska, Sylwia. Red.
Pawłowski, Jakub Michał Banaszak, Bogusław. Red.
Przygodzki, Jacek Przygodzki, Jacek. Red. Jurek, Piotr. Rec.
Golka-Jastrząb, Ewa Balicki, Ryszard. Red. Jabłoński, Mariusz. Red. Wójtowicz, Krzysztof. Rec.
Kuropatwa, Alicja Sadowski, Mirosław (1964- ). Red. Szymaniec, Piotr. Red. Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Katedra Doktryn Politycznych i Prawnych