@misc{May_Joanna_Zwłoka_2021,
 author={May, Joanna},
 copyright={Copyright by CNS},
 copyright={Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o., Wrocław 2021},
 address={Wrocław},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2021},
 publisher={Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego},
 language={pol},
 abstract={In the article devoted the delay of the court enforcement officer in discontinuing enforcement proceedings, the author analyses among others the impact of changing the nature of discontinuance of proceedings due to the creditor’s inactivity on the risk of instituting disciplinary proceedings against a court bailiff. She also considers the extent to which the court enforcement officers themselves have the impact on the increase in disciplinary proceedings, and to what extent they bear the consequences of ill-considered legislative changes. To present the title issue, except for to discussing the grounds for discontinuing enforcement proceedings due to the creditor’s inactivity (Civil Procedure Code Art.824 § 1 point 4) and at his request (Civil Procedure Code Art.825 point 1) in the previous and binding legal status and related costs, the article additionally summarizes the court enforcement officer’s actions with unreasonable delay with the excessive length of the proceedings.},
 type={text},
 title={Zwłoka komornika w umorzeniu postępowania egzekucyjnego jako podstawa odpowiedzialności dyscyplinarnej},
 keywords={unjustified delay, the court enforcement officer’s action with unreasonable delay, discontinuance of enforcement proceedings, disciplinary proceedings},
}