@misc{Kyselovská_Tereza_Critical_2019,
 author={Kyselovská, Tereza},
 copyright={Copyright by Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2023},
 address={Warszawa},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2019},
 publisher={Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck},
 language={eng},
 abstract={This article analyzes the „mosaic principle” under Art. 7 Para 2 Brussels Ibis Regulation for disputes arising out of non-contractual obligations on the Internet, online defamation and online infringements of copyright in particular. The subject of the analysis are decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU, namely Shevill, eDate, Bolagsupplysningen, Pinckney and Hejduk. The aforementioned decisions are critically analyzed in terms of the nature of dissemination of information on the Internet and the appropriateness and usefulness of their interpretation in the context of the objectives and principles underlying the Brussels Ibis Regulation.},
 type={text},
 title={Critical Analysis of the „Mosaic Principle” Under Art. 7 Para 2 Brussels Ibis Regulation for Disputes Arising out of Non-Contractual Obligations on the Internet},
 keywords={jurisdiction, Brussels Ibis Regulation, non-contractual obligations, place of harmful event, center of interest, mosaic principle, defamation, infringement of personality rights, infringement of intellectual property rights, copyright, online, internet, case law, Court of Justice of the European Union, Shevill, eDate, Bolagsupplysningen Pinckney, Hejduk},
}