@misc{Pfitzer_Daniel_Das,
 author={Pfitzer, Daniel},
 howpublished={online},
 language={pol},
 language={eng},
 abstract={The Book De medicina of the Etymologiae of Isidore of Seville. Critical Reflections on the Organization of Knowledge in ‘Modern’ Edition and Medieval Codices: In this article, various Etymologiae codices are contrasted with the basal edition of Wallace Martin Lindsay in order to illustrate the edition’s shortcomings. For this purpose, the so far disregarded Cod. 25(2) from the Biblioteca de la Real Academia de la Historia in Madrid is also taken into account. The paper discusses the multilayered differences between Lindsay’s edition and the medieval codices regarding their organization of knowledge. However, despite these differences Lindsay’s work was deeply influential amongst researchers during the 20th century – scholars usually just adopted his idea of Isidore’s Etymologiae without further questioning. Finally, the article stresses the need for a revision of Lindsay’s edition using modern digital editing techniques, which take paratextual elements and printed incunabula into consideration},
 type={text},
 title={Das Buch De Medicina der Etymologiae Isidors von Sevilla. Kritische Uberlegungen zur Wissenorganisation von ‚moderner‘ Edition und mittelalterlichen Codicesi},
 doi={https://doi.org/10.34616/samai.2024.9.87.109},
 keywords={Isidore of Seville, Etymologiae, De medicina, Wallace Martin Lindsay, knowledge organization, codices versus edition},
}