Details zum Objekt: Between consensus and the “tax agreement” provided for in the draft of the Tax Ordinance of June 4, 2019

Beschreibung

• PLMET:
  
  http://confluence.man.poznan.pl/community/display/FBCMETGUIDE
• Title:
  
  
  Between consensus and the “tax agreement” provided for in the draft of the Tax Ordinance of June 4, 2019
• Alternative title:
  
  
  Między konsensusem a „umową podatkową” przewidzianą projektem Ordynacji Podatkowej z dnia 4 czerwca 2019 roku
• Creator:
  
  
  Tsima, Maria
  
• Subject and Keywords:
  
  
  Tax Ordinance
   ;
  tax agreement
   ;
  public law
   ;
  private law
   ;
  
  
  ordynacja podatkowa
   ;
  umowa podatkowa
   ;
  prawo publiczne
   ;
  prawo prywatne
• Description:
  
  
  Tyt. zeszytu: Current Legal Trends and Legal Challenges in the European Union
• Abstract:
  
  
  A change in the perception of the relationship between the tax debtor and the tax creditor is necessary. The regulation of non-governing forms of operation of tax authorities is the normative basis that determines the change in the way in which tax matters are dealt with. This article reviews the proposal for consensual resolution of disputes contained in the draft of the Tax Ordinance of March 8, 2019. In this draft, a chapter entitled “Tax agreement” was included, which is devoted entirely to the structure of the tax agreement. However, to what extent does the outlined legal structure of the tax agreement make it possible to create a negotiating space between the taxpayer and the tax authority? The consensuality that the parties strive for should foster the pursuit of the private interest in the optimal dimension and, at the same time, should not affect the public interest. This is possible. In this way, the equality of parties manifests itself in the framework of consumer contracts where the entrepreneur’s party is stronger or on the level of repressive law for example, in criminal law — where, as indicated, the consensual way of settling the matter should not disqualify the aspiration to equalize the position of all participants of this consensus. The position defended by the present author is that obtaining a contractual agreement in tax law based on a consensus assuming the parity of parties does not exclude the possibility of pursuing a fiscal interest.
• Place of publishing:
  
  Wrocław
• Publisher:
  
  Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
• Contributor:
  
  
  Jakubowski, Sebastian
  :
  Redaktor,
• Institution:
  
  
  Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii
• Date issued:
  
  2019
• Date copyrighted:
  
  2019
• Detailed Type:
  
  
  czasopisma (wydawnictwa ciągłe)
   ;
  artykuł
• Identifier:
  
  oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:108489  ; https://doi.org/10.19195/1733-5779.29.4  ;
  ISSN 1733-5779
   ;
  ISSN 0239-6661
• DOI:
  
  10.19195/1733-5779.29.4
• Source:
  
  PAd 102060 II
• Language:
  
  eng
• Relation:
  
  Studenckie Prace Prawnicze, Administratywistyczne i Ekonomiczne, ISSN 1733-5779. Nr 29 (2019), s. 47-62
• Is version of:
  
  Czasopisma Naukowe w Sieci (CNS)
• Rights holder:
  
  Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o.
• Autor opisu:
  
  WR U/PAdbg

Das Objekt befindet sich in den Sammlungen:

Zusätzliche Informationen

• Erstellungsdatum: 2020-05-15
• Zuletzt geändert am: 2024-04-22
• Anzahl der Ansichten des Inhaltsobjekts: 72
• Sie können auch die Beschreibung des Objekts in diesen Formaten herunterladen:
  RDF
   ;
  OAI-PMH
• Laden Sie das IIIF-Manifest herunter:
  https://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/iiif-manifest/manifest/108489/PDF.json