@misc{Jarosz-Żukowska_Sylwia_Sprawa, author={Jarosz-Żukowska, Sylwia}, copyright={Copyright by Sylwia Jarosz-Żukowska}, address={Wrocław}, howpublished={online}, publisher={E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego}, language={pol}, abstract={The study deals with the problem of the effects of the continuous to this day neglect of issuing ordinance, which would define the principles and procedure for paying compensation to former owners of state-owned enterprises announced in the Act of January 3, 1946 on the nationalization of industry. Due to the fact that the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal in their judgments stated no grounds for seeking damages for the so-called legislative neglect, and in the circumstrances of the legislator's inaction on regulating historical problems, former owners saw hope in the Strasbourg Tribunal. The ECtHR has upheld its previous case-law on transformation cases in the decision Plon of October 3, 2017 and excluded - as it seems definitively - the possibility of replacing the legislator and national courts in the task of systemic regulation of the redress of some former owners of nationalized enterprises in some form.}, title={Sprawa nacjonalizacji przemysłu w Polsce przed Europejskim Trybunałem Praw Człowieka}, keywords={commemorative book, constitutionalism, Constitution, democracy, human rights, right to court, freedoms and rights}, }